Welcome to myResearchSpace Sign in | Join | Help

The function of the wrapper chapters in a thesis submitted as a collection of papers

At UWA, a thesis can be presented as a series of papers. When a thesis is submitted in this way, the papers must be "wrapped" by at least two sections:
  1. A General Introduction which sets out the context of the thesis and explains the organisation and structure of the thesis; and
  2. A General Discussion which draws together the main findings of the thesis in the context of previous research, and establishes the significance of the work.
These sections must be written at a higher level of abstratction than the included papers, and this is highlighted by one examiner's comments outlining how examiners view the function of these sections:

"While the thesis follows the UWA option for a PhD of presenting a series of published papers, the abstract and concluding discussion need to be synthesizing statements, addressing and attempting to explain discrepancies or common issues between the results of the various investigations."

In particular, if two of the included papers appear to present conflicting results, the meaning of this conflict needs to be discussed. If the separate papers present results that support your thesis, then the way in which they together strengthen your thesis argument needs to be drawn out and highlighted. Thus, the wrapper sections are not simply summaries of what is to come or what has already been presented; they are stand-alone chapters written at a high level of abstraction addressing the meaning and implications of your work.
Published Wednesday, July 26, 2006 1:14 PM by robyn.owens
Filed under:

Comment Notification

If you would like to receive an email when updates are made to this post, please register here

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

# re: The function of the wrapper chapters in a thesis submitted as a collection of papers

There are a number of advantages in organising to submit a thesis as a series of papers
i. Submitting a thesis in this form resolves the conflict between preparing the thesis for examination and preparing papers for publication. In essence, they amount to the same thing. In a climate where completion time limits are shortening, you need not feel that, whilst preparing papers for publication, you are running out of time to finish your thesis.
ii. If you have reviewer’s comments on your papers before submitting your thesis, you can use this feedback to improve your thesis prior to examination. This will not only improve the quality of your work, but also your confidence. By the time you submit your thesis for examination, at least a (perhaps substantial) proportion of it will have been subject to the scrutiny of experts in the field.
iii. Having part of the work published prior to examination establishes it as worthy of publication, which is one of the criteria for thesis examination. The larger the proportion that is published, the easier it is for your examiners and the Board of the Graduate Research School to recognise that your work is substantial and of value.
iv. In the event of disagreement in the examiners’ assessment of the thesis, it will be easier to defend if the work has earlier been validated through the peer-review process.
v. Experience in writing for publication is extremely valuable for candidates wishing to pursue competitive postdoctoral positions. Publications would also form part of a CV that could be submitted to potential employers.

However, there are also some challenges in successfully submitting a thesis as a series of papers
i. The decision to submit a thesis in the form of a series of published/publishable papers should be given careful consideration. You should make the decision early in your candidature, taking into account your School’s general disposition toward this submission format, as well as the opinion of your supervisor. Although the University allows all candidates to submit their thesis as a series of papers, it should be noted that this is not an accepted practice across all disciplines.
ii. When presenting a thesis as a collection of papers it is easy to make the error of allowing the thesis to become disjointed. This will stand against it. You must ensure that the papers are presented in a logical order, are linked together, and address the central thesis argument. The candidate MUST ensure that the thesis is a consistent and unified whole, prepared specifically for the submission of examination for the degree. Therefore, the candidate needs to critically place any published or publishable works used in the body of the thesis in the context of the thesis as a whole. In general, every thesis should include an introduction chapter which presents the general context of the research; the significance of the problem; the aims of the study; the methodology and/or theory; and a statement of the organisation of the thesis. Every thesis should also include a conclusion chapter which provides an overarching, critical assessment of the research. The introduction and conclusion chapters must link together the various papers submitted as part of the thesis, providing continuity to the extent that the reader can understand the logic behind the progression of the research program.
Friday, July 28, 2006 1:15 PM by Michael.Azariadis

# re: The function of the wrapper chapters in a thesis submitted as a collection of papers

Publishing in high quality journals can be a challenging but highly rewarding aspect of your candidature. On Wednesday 20th of September Professor David Trigger (from the School of Social and Cultural Studies) and Professor Nick Forster (from the Graduate School of Management) will present a seminar for postgraduate students on 'How to Prepare your Research for Publication'. The Venue will be the Alexander Lecture Theatre and the seminar will commence at 1pm. Below is a summary of Professor Forster's presentation:
'From thesis to market: getting your first book published'

Abstract: While many people aspire to publish their research as a book, getting one published for the first time can be a daunting prospect. What am I going to write about? Is there a market for my book? Will anyone be interested in publishing it? Which publishers should I approach? Are there any reliable blueprints or formulas for success in book publishing? How do I deal with the inevitable rejections from publishers? This seminar will look at the practicalities of publishing a book for the first time, from the initial concept, to establishing which market(s) it is aimed at, to the development of its structure/main themes/contents, to writing a formal proposal, and then approaching publishers who may be interested in backing, producing and marketing it.
Monday, July 31, 2006 4:47 PM by Michael.Azariadis

Leave a Comment

(required) 
required 
(required) 

  
Enter Code Here: Required