<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://myresearchspace.grs.uwa.edu.au/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Psy-supervisors and other discourses of power</title><link>http://myresearchspace.grs.uwa.edu.au/blogs/michaelazariadisblog/archive/2006/11/22/psy-supervisors-and-other-discourses-of-power.aspx</link><description>It seems that the practice of conceptualising models of supervision is alive and well in studies of higher education. Since my last blog (where I identified three supervisory management styles; these being directorial , pastoral and laissez-faire ) I</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator></channel></rss>