<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://myresearchspace.grs.uwa.edu.au/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Engel was wrong - so was Atwood</title><link>http://myresearchspace.grs.uwa.edu.au/blogs/esmeralda_rocha/archive/2009/06/26/engel-was-wrong-so-was-atwood.aspx</link><description>You know the famous Engel quote: An ounce of action is worth a tonne of theory. Well that's bollocks, at least for the average Ph.D. student... I propose instead that an ounce of theory is worth a tonne of action. You spend weeks of source/data analysis,</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator></channel></rss>