the soil on Mars

...musings on Amundson R, Ewing S, Dietrich W, Sutter B, Owen J, Chadwick OA, Nishiizumi K, Walvoord M, McKay C. 2008. On the in situ aqueous alteration of soils on Mars. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 72:3845-3864.

It's great when an article related to one's own discipline is about something exotic, and it would be hard to imagine a more exotic environment than the surface of Mars. I enjoy highlighting interesting developments to students, so this year's Introduction to Geochemistry students had the data from this article as an example when we learned about mass balance during weathering. And this was my first crack at teaching this geochemical topic to students as well, so I learned a lot too. We used the subject matter, if not the Martian data, in a prac class, using an excellent dataset published by Oh & Richter (2005).

Amundson et al.'s hypothesis is that liquid water must have existed on Mars at some stage in that planet's history, based on the mineralogical record (minerals which need water to form, such as smectites and jarosite, have been identified on the Martian surface). Amundson et al. further tested this hypothesis by using elemental analysis data from conveniently exposed "soil profiles" on Mars, within the Gusev and Endurance craters investigated by the Mars Exploration Rover (Opportunity) mission. They were looking for evidence of absolute loss or gain of elements which might reflect transport by liquid water - and they found exactly that. Soils were depleted in major rock-forming elements (Si, Al, Mg, Ca, Fe, etc.) relative to the likely parent materials (Gusev basalt, or aeolian dust), probably representing earlier weathering mediated by water. A key result was the enrichment in the soil profiles of sulfur, chlorine and bromine, consistent with the aqueous transport of sulfate, chloride and bromide salts followed by drying.

The point is also made that comparable environments (very dry and cold; e.g., some of Antarctica) exist on Earth, and similar soil-forming processes have occurred here (on Earth, that is!) as well. The authors refer to such terrestrial soils as being "abiotic"; a bit of a misnomer, I thought, where perhaps they meant the absence of higher organisms (surely some microorganisms were present in all the Earth examples - were they there on Mars?). Plus there is the usual issue with mass-balance approaches (fully acknowledged) of matching the weathered/altered material to its assumed parent material.

This was a fun article to read. It's not often that I get to read and use a publication that contains so much language usually reserved (in my reading experience) for science fiction - Mars landers, differences in gravity - all wonderful stuff.

Image from www.nasa.gov